The Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has stirred controversy online for having been tested on animals.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency says the jab has shown 95 percent efficacy in its finals trials and is safe to be rolled out nationwide.
The UK, which was the first country in the world to approve of the vaccine, is expecting 800,000 doses to arrive in the coming days. It has ordered enough doses (40 million) to vaccinate 20 million people so far.
‘Significant logistical challenges ‘
Prime Minister Boris Johnson says priority will be given to care home staff, NHS staff, and patients. He says this will ensure none of the vaccines are wasted, as it has to be stored at -70C, and hospitals have the facility to meet this requirement.
According to the BBC, Johnson told the public to not get ‘carried away’ with the hope a vaccine could provide – stating ‘significant logistical challenges remain’.
Earlier this month, Pfizer and its partner BioNTech announced the ‘vaccine candidate produced neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, in macaques, as well as antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in both the nonhuman primates and mice’.
‘Saving lives’
The Vegan Society has recently released a statement addressing this after several vegans have slammed the vaccine for being tested on animals.
“It has never been more important for us to talk about the definition of veganism in the context of medications, including vaccines,” the organization wrote.
“The definition of veganism recognizes that it is not always possible or practicable to avoid animal use, which is particularly relevant to medical situations.
“In the case of Covid-19, vaccination will play a fundamental role in tackling the pandemic and saving lives. As all vaccines currently are tested on animals, at this stage it is impossible to have a vaccine that has been created without animal use.”
The Vegan Society added that in the ‘unlikely event’ that the vaccine is made mandatory – a vegan would be able to request an exemption based on their beliefs.
It added: “However, we would like to make it clear that The Vegan Society encourages vegans to look after their health and that of others, in order to continue to be effective advocates for veganism and other animals.”
0
Leave a Comment
Plant Based News Comment Policy
In short:- If you act with maturity and consideration for other users, you should have no problems. Please read our Comment policy before commenting.
“Saving lives” by taking countless more lives? I’ll skip this vaccine (I’ve never taken a flu shot either).
And we have a deadly pandemic that arose from animal “wet markets” in China (not from a lab, as the infection in Danish minks proves). On top of this, in developing a vaccine, more animals are being used! And then we pray and say “Peace on Earth”!!!
Get a life! To refuse this vaccine because animals are involved in research is ridiculous
I have to have the vaccine due to work and family, but I also have to take medication that has lactose in it. It sucks like hell, but it’s needed at this time.
CONFLICTS OF VITAL (LIFE-OR-DEATH) INTERESTS
The moral principle that fully covers the ethics of veganism is: Never cause suffering unless it is vitally necessary (i.e., to save your life or the life of your loved ones).
Life-saving medicine is a vital necessity.
Conflicts of vital interest are a tragic and inescapable biological fact of life on earth.
Vegans and vegan activists need to focus on preventing what is by far the greatest cause of suffering: the suffering that is not caused out of vital necessity, but for taste, fashion, or fun.
The prospects of preventing suffering through worldwide veganism would be needlessly imperilled if the false impression were created that to be vegan means renouncing life-saving medical treatment, or denying it to others.
When most humans are no longer causing suffering unnecessarily it will be a different world, morally; and that will be the world in whch to confront the tragedy of conflict of vital interest.
CONFLICTS OF VITAL (LIFE-OR-DEATH) INTERESTS
The moral principle that fully covers the ethics of veganism is: Never cause suffering unless it is vitally necessary (i.e., to save your life or the life of your loved ones).
Life-saving medicine is a vital necessity.
Conflicts of vital interest are a tragic and inescapable biological fact of life on earth.
Vegans and vegan activists need to focus on preventing what is by far the greatest cause of suffering: the suffering that is not caused out of vital necessity, but for taste, fashion, or fun.
The prospects of preventing suffering through worldwide veganism would be needlessly imperilled if the false impression were created that to be vegan means renouncing life-saving medical treatment, or denying it to others.
When most humans are no longer causing suffering unnecessarily it will be a different world, morally; and that will be the world in whch to confront the tragedy of conflict of vital interest
Let the non-vegans get the vaccine. It’s their fault this thing started anyway.